Forbes: World’s MOST POWERFUL MAN

From CBSNews.com:
Just in case being president of a United States engaged in two wars and mired in economic difficulties wasn’t enough responsibility, Barack Obama was named the world’s most powerful man by Forbes Magazine.
With just 67 spots on the list, the magazine says it considered these questions before tabbing its all-star team of world powers:
“Do they have influence over lots of other people? Do they control relatively large financial resources compared with their peers? Are they powerful in multiple spheres?”
Rounding out the top 10 are:
- Hu Jintao, president of China
- Vladimir Putin, prime minister of Russia
- Ben Bernanke, chairman of U.S. Federal Reserve
- Sergey Lin and Larry Page, founders of Google
- Carlos Slim Helu, CEO, TelMex
- Rupert Murdoch, chairman, NewsCorp.
- Michael T. Duke, president, CEO of Wal-Mart
- Prince Sultan bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, ruler of Saudi Arabia
- William Gates III, founder of Microsoft

Whether it is winning the Nobel Peace Prize or being named the WORLD’s most Powerful Man, we know that POTUS’s greatness weighs heavily on his shoulders. He is being punched shoved, and batted around by a political press that has no respect for the grave issues facing our nation. While I do not always agree with Andrew Sullivan, I believe these remarks on the Afghan decision making process are dead on point here:
“What strikes me about this is the enormous self-confidence this reveals. Here is a young president, prepared to allow himself to be portrayed as ‘weak’ or ‘dithering’ in the slow and meticulous arrival at public policy. He is trusting the reality to help expose what we need to do. He is allowing the debate — however messy and confusing and emotional — to take its time and reveal the real choices in front of us. This is politically risky, of course. Those who treat politics as a contact-sport, whose insistence is on the ‘game’ of who wins which news cycle, or who can spin each moment in a political storm as a harbinger of whatever, will pounce and shriek and try to bounce the president into a decision. And those who believe that what matters in war is charging ahead regardless at all times will also grandstand against the president’s insistence on prudence.”
Sullivan aptly describes the political conundrum Obama faces daily, while acknowledging the supreme confidence of the most divine POTUS we have ever seen in our lifetime.
I am grateful that President Obama is giving this decision all the gravity it deserves. This country’s political media is too busy trying to think everything is a popularity contest. Every day we are treated to issues being polarized and spun rather than cogent analysis of problems along with possible solutions.
Afghanistan is a decision that will impact the lives of our soldiers and their families, send young men and women to their deaths, cost hundreds of billions of dollars, and potentially achieve nothing. At the same time, they are saying that he’s moving too quickly on health care, and that he should take more time on such an important decision to make sure he gets it right, even while hundreds are dying every month from lack of access while insurance executives are getting rich on the suffering of others.
The sheer hypocrisy of the political media is simply staggering!
The complexities of these issues they attempt to reduce to snide and derisive commentary like ‘dithering’ or inflame and create wedge issues like abortion vs. discussing core issues of HCR and then there is the whinning about the financial crisis where time was of the essence to prevent economic collapse..but yet Obama is blamed for the stagnation of the economy? This Presidency is still in it’s infancy.
Sometimes listening to all of this is just surreal. It makes my head hurt and I get dizzy from the elaborate lies, distortions and misquotes. These military leaks are nothing but the same crass dismissivness of the issues to create some partisan rallying point just like the insurance lobbyists do with health care. Because let’s not forget WAR IS BIG BUSINESS we are spending 2B a week on this war, and unable to take care of our domestic issues because the military industrial complex is sucking the economic life out of America. Only the munitions people and defense contractors are getting rich and richer, just like the insurance people.
Obama is in the DC labyrinth of structured power, being squeezed from both ends by the biggest lobbies in DC…Defense and Healthcare…and smack dab in the middle is the economic banking crisis and investment banks…it is one HUGE clusterphuck.
But therein lies the machiaveillan beauty of being the world’s most powerful man.
They think Obama can’t see their clandestine structures of subterfuge but he gets the complexity and they can’t move him on the chess board like they could Bush, Clinton and Reagan who did the bidding of the powerbrokers in DC. Obama is not beholden to them and he will NOT be MOVED. More importantly his brilliant mind sees through their multi-layered webs of deceit and skulduggery.
Obama SEES the Big Lie of national defense for what it is: theft from every other priority in our society.
Twenty years after the cold war, and we’re spending even more? This is lunacy, plain and simple. Afghanistan is a failed state for a very good reason: it’s people have no abiding interest in developing a successful state. Tribal societies will never be nations, in the western sense. There is not a military solution to every problem, and using our military to teach civics lessons through interpreters is preposterous. Obama knows this and they are having difficulty pushing him into an endless war. He sees the bright lines…they attempt to obscure. I can’t even imagine what a hell hole we would be in right now if that WARMONGERER HRC was President. She would be so anxious to prove she had balls that she would have already sent more troops and probably re-instituted the draft so she could send more American kids to die in the sand for a worthless cause.
When is the last time we have had anyone tell us WHY we are in Afghan? I am waiting because I knowObama is going to break, it. down. when he reaches his decision, he is going to give a tutorial to the nation on why we are there, how long we are staying, what he plans to accomplish and when he will bring our troops home.
The President needs to back these NationalDefense WARMongerers of the Military Industrial Complex folks up even further: who actually owns this problem? If no one, then why should the United States suddenly decide that we’re best prepared to solve it? And what should the relative priority of this solution be, given that we have so many other domestic matters to address?
Obama is asking the tough questions, that they ain’t NEVA had to answer, and they are not use to that. Moreover, they have nothing to squeeze this POTUS with, no scandals, no payoffs…he ain’t buying…so what do they do
LEAK, LEAK, LEAK….but they done found out this President ain’t weak….he will NOT BE MOVED.
Those military folks might believe they are rock, but rock meet water. POTUS is fluid like water and he steadily drips on that rock. Errybody knows what happens to rock under the steady drip of water…erosion.
Obama is more surreptitious than all those who believe they wield power in Washington. As the world’s most powerful man, POTUS impresses upon them the power of his example moreso than the example of power they desire him to use.
Take your time Obama, get it right…show them you are truly the WORLD’s Most Powerful Man and the power of America resides in very wise hands.
ALL HAIL to THE CHIEF!!









View Comments
November 12th, 2009
do you have the link to the Forbes article?
November 12th, 2009
Wonderful piece, LaRapierWit! WEESee and know our President is the hardest working MAN in the world.
SO:
“LEAK, LEAK, LEAK….but they done found out this President ain’t weak….he will NOT BE MOVED.!”
I know that's right!
November 12th, 2009
O goodness…HEAVY INTENSE IN-FIGHTING on National Security Council
“It was a tense meeting this morning at the White House, as Ambassador Karl Eikenberry addressed the National Security Council by teleconference from Kabul just hours after the media got hold of his dissent on the crucial question of sending more troops to Afghanistan. “He is very unpopular here,” said a National Security Council staffer who described the meeting.
No one was happy to read in The Washington Post that Eikenberry, who commanded the war himself from 2005 to 2007, thinks that the Karzai government needs to demonstrate its commitment to anti-corruption measures before the administration can responsibly authorize another troop increase. The prevailing theory is that “he leaked his own cables” because “he has a beef with McChrystal,” the staffer said. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, Eikenberry’s successor as NATO commander in Afghanistan, has requested an increase in troops to support a counterinsurgency strategy with a substantial counterterrorism component.
But Eikenberry — who also briefed the White House by teleconference yesterday — reiterated his concerns. The ambassador told the NSC not to send additional troops to Afghanistan “without an exit strategy” and urged that the president to adopt a “purely civilian approach” with the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development in the lead, not the military. According to the NSC staffer, Eikenberry “wants a realignment” of USAID, the Afghanistan inspector general’s office and the State Department’s stabilization and reconstruction office. Eikenberry said President Obama “wants that” — although Obama was not in the meeting — and he hailed the arrival of the new USAID administrator-nominee, Rajiv Shah, “because he will not wage war when the org charts start changing.”
http://washingtonindependent.com/67521/inside-t...
I wonder if Obama feels like a mother with a bunch of unruly kids!!
November 12th, 2009
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/11/12/busin...
November 12th, 2009
I just edited your post w/ a page break and some hyperlinks and block quotes. Hope you don't mind.
November 12th, 2009
The President knows he is wrong for all the GQ poses…
In every photo this brotha is in…he looks like he should be on the cover of GQ.
Or maybe it's just me thinking he should be on the cover….
much respect ….First Lady.
November 12th, 2009
Thanks Shanti!! ((((hugs))))
November 12th, 2009
thanks
November 12th, 2009
Thanks so much CG!!
Looks good… I like it!!
((((((BIGHUGSandLOVE)))))))
Now I gotz to get those skillz too!!
November 12th, 2009
You were right the first time.
The President looks like he should beon the cover of GQ! So fine!
Damn!
November 12th, 2009
*giving CG and LRW fist bumps*
November 12th, 2009
Excellent post, LRW!
November 12th, 2009
http://rlv.zcache.com/president_obama_collectib...
November 12th, 2009
thanks!
November 12th, 2009
MIRANDA….thread corruption….
but this was too juicy of a talking point to pass up…guess the phuck what
The RNC's health insurance plan “covers elective abortion — a procedure the party's own platform calls 'a fundamental assault on innocent human life,'” reports Politico.
FEC records “show the RNC purchases its insurance from Cigna. Two sales agents for the company said that the RNC's policy covers elective abortion.”
November 12th, 2009
Thanks for adding to my addiction…thanks, Miranda
November 12th, 2009
Well of course it does…………..if you're gonna have a bunch of mistresses you gotta have some protection for those “I forgot my pill” moments.
November 12th, 2009
LOL……and you can order the apron with this on it!
http://www.zazzle.com/president_obama_collectib...
November 12th, 2009
Just…wrong!
November 12th, 2009
Thanks, Miranda. I just ordered 3!
) The holidays are approaching quickly!
November 12th, 2009
Got it!
November 12th, 2009
Sully is on point with this and so are you LaRapierWit. I LOVE that PBO is taking all the time he needs to figure this out because when he finally makes a decision, he will break it down like a fraction–I call it his professor mode–why we are in Afghanistan, the goals and how we will get out. Shoot, he'll even tell us the history of Afghanistan since colonialism onward. He will not rush this or anything else for that matter. This is one of my favorite qualities about the president. I'm mad as heck that the banks aren't paying for their irresponsibility but I do know that PBO is not afraid to come off as weak or dithering if he is acquiring information about policy. O never acts without information and that's the best type of President you can have. Like the man said during the AIG bonus scandal, “I like to know what I'm talking about before I speak.” That's the dude you want running the store–ask questions then shoot.
Second: I love how Gen Jones and Secretary Gates defended PBO when McChrystal leaked that report to the Washington Post. The funny thing is that the report said that troops weren't enough alone–but that's the part that everyone emphasized–without emphasizing that thousands and thousands of those troops would have to willingly put themselves up as cannon fodder. The media is just so lazy and trifling and that's why W got away with so much b/c they shoot first and ask questions later.
Third: On the Eikenberry cables. That's PBO's leak right there. I know a lot of people on the National Security Council thought PBO was Mr. Hopey McChangey and was supposed to be so scared and frightened by them that as soon as they said, “Send 40K troops, he was supposed to cower and cry and say yes, but the AP reported today after CBS said he's going to send the 40K that he told everybody that all their options suck and they need to come back to him with EXIT STRATEGIES.
All these leaks that had been going on to try to get him to hurry up is not working and I know that Eikenberry's cables got leaked on purpose by the administration to put McChrystal in check. All the info from the Plouffe book is confirming my positive suspicions about PBO–he is grimey when he needs to be. He will throw an elbow and make you say thank you, may I have another afterwards. I think Valerie Jarrett says that O and her's approach is to tell people to go to hell and make them enjoy the trip.
November 12th, 2009
Welcome jojaraze! I enjoyed your commentary, and it is on point and refreshing.
Thanks for stopping by WSY. Stay a while and visit with us. Glad to have you here.
November 12th, 2009
Hello jojaraze! Welcome to our site. I enjoyed reading your comment and hope you continue to offer your perspective.
November 12th, 2009
Welcome to Wee See You, Jojaraze!
Glad to have you here. Please do come again. Wee enjoy your commentary!
November 12th, 2009
Thanks for the welcome guys. JJP transplant…all y'all left there and it got all boring. Besides, Sepia and Town slay me and the news roundups are wonderful for staying informed.
November 12th, 2009
LOL! Sepia and Town are are hoot! Town's still around at JJP isn't she?
Anywhoo, good to have you here, and enjoy yourself.
November 12th, 2009
What we are witnessing is Unparalled STATESMANSHIP…POTUS got it ALL!!
I see the Eikenberry as Obama's checkmate of McChrystal and all the other warhawks like HCR on the National Security council. Obama is like if you want to take to the press, c'mon…I will play media chess right withcha!!
BAM! We first find out McChrystal is the one who fabricated the whole Tillman story..which goes directly to his judgement and now we hear from someone with even more experience in AFGHAN than him who is completely opposed to his plan.
Let the fun and games begin…cause when the dust settles it is going to be real clear.
When it comes to gamesmanship and statesmanship…Obama is without peer.
Hey Jojo…have you noticed how we have not heard a word from Holbrooke even though he is supposedly the special envoy to Afghan?
November 12th, 2009
Where is Town at..somebody need to tell her to come visit over here. I wonder if she just lurks.
November 12th, 2009
Sepia is a hoot with…”Who Gon' Check Me, Boo”!
She's too funny!
November 12th, 2009
I know Plantsmantx (sp?) lurks. Heh…
November 12th, 2009
Thanks again for the welcome guys. I'll come around guys, don't smother me with so much love
I've been lurking for 2 weeks, now. That article about Hamsher and Huffington was on point. I'm not saying progressives should give PBO a break but so much of the commentary is asinine and ill informed. Offer politically feasible alternatives to what PBO should do instead of calling him sell-out, punk, etc. He's your guy, the best you're gonna get. Work with him, not against him to make sure he does his job well. Booman Tribune has been pivotal in keeping me sane, along with prayer–I pray for the Prez and FLOTUS Obama a great deal–during this whole HCR debacle. When I found out Hamsher basically put Lieberman in blackface, costing Lamont the Senate race, I just disliked her more. I don't like Lieberman, but that was reprehensible.
Oh yeah, I'm glad you guys put up the Politifact Truth-o-meter and the Obama-meter–shows you guys have gravitas. Politifact kept me informed during the campaign–really good, informative stuff.
November 12th, 2009
Gasp!
November 12th, 2009
Obama's Afghan deliberations send messages
Slow, methodical approach to war decision leaves him open to critics
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33892365/ns/world_n...
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama's drawn-out decision-making on Afghanistan is sending messages. To the Afghan government: Clean up your act. To the Pentagon: I'm no rubber stamp. To the American public: More troops cannot be the sole answer.
Obama has been accused by some Republicans of “dithering” about whether to send more troops and deepen U.S. involvement in an increasingly unpopular war.
The slow process also has left him open to critics who recall his pronouncement in March, after developing what he called a “stronger, smarter and comprehensive” Afghan war strategy, that the situation there was “increasingly perilous.” He ordered more troops to battle then, with little discernible result so far.
This time, he is making it clear he will not rushed. Or pushed. And the way the messages he is sending play out could help determine whether the war effort is sustainable in the long run.
November 13th, 2009
ahahahahhhhaaaaa!
November 13th, 2009
LaRapier,
Check your email
November 13th, 2009
Hey, Jojoraze! Welcome to WSY!rnrnInteresting analysis regarding the Eikenberry story. It’s very interesting to watch how PBO manuevers in a room full of vultures. You know, I think most people are projecting the racial stereotype of the “raging Black man” on Obama, so when he doesn’t come out thumping his chest, grabbing his b—s all Tupac style, they’re so disappointed. rnrnMemo to white folks: Not all Black men are Suge Knight.
November 13th, 2009
Hey, Jojoraze! Welcome to WSY!
Interesting analysis regarding the Eikenberry story. It's very interesting to watch how PBO manuevers in a room full of vultures. You know, I think most people are projecting the racial stereotype of the “raging Black man” on Obama, so when he doesn't come out thumping his chest, grabbing his b—s all Tupac style, they're so disappointed.
Memo to white folks: Not all Black men are Suge Knight.
November 13th, 2009
*blushes a lovely shade of red*
November 13th, 2009
*blushes a lovely shade of red*
November 13th, 2009
k..got it!
November 13th, 2009
k..got it!
Trackbacks