<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Open Thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/</link>
	<description>Keeping Our Eyes on African Americans: Our History, Political Issues, &#38; Popular Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:55:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webb</title>
		<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/#comment-9773</link>
		<dc:creator>Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeseeyou.com/?p=3530#comment-9773</guid>
		<description>Hey NMP--Great 2 See U!  Please don&#039;t be a stranger!&lt;br&gt;...and I promise that there will be no comparisons to Judas...unless you earn it, lol, smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey NMP&#8211;Great 2 See U!  Please don&#39;t be a stranger!<br />&#8230;and I promise that there will be no comparisons to Judas&#8230;unless you earn it, lol, smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: audiegrl</title>
		<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/#comment-9256</link>
		<dc:creator>audiegrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeseeyou.com/?p=3530#comment-9256</guid>
		<description>No not me, I think it was Ogenec. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m a lover, not a fighter! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No not me, I think it was Ogenec. </p>
<p>I&#39;m a lover, not a fighter! <img src='http://weeseeyou.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laRapierWit</title>
		<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/#comment-9255</link>
		<dc:creator>laRapierWit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeseeyou.com/?p=3530#comment-9255</guid>
		<description>&quot;Says they have lost their minds and are living in some alternate reality.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, of course they have and are...being gay demands you live in an alternate reality to begin with. When they get hypped the tawdry seams show and it just gets uglier and uglier.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As individuals homosexuals can be wonderful, engaging, enlightening and great to have as friends..but their politics simply suck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Says they have lost their minds and are living in some alternate reality.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, of course they have and are&#8230;being gay demands you live in an alternate reality to begin with. When they get hypped the tawdry seams show and it just gets uglier and uglier.</p>
<p>As individuals homosexuals can be wonderful, engaging, enlightening and great to have as friends..but their politics simply suck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PBomb</title>
		<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/#comment-9254</link>
		<dc:creator>PBomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeseeyou.com/?p=3530#comment-9254</guid>
		<description>***Staying ovation***</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>***Staying ovation***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PBomb</title>
		<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/#comment-9253</link>
		<dc:creator>PBomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeseeyou.com/?p=3530#comment-9253</guid>
		<description>There are some decent gay activists out there. There&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://Lawdork.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lawdork.net&lt;/a&gt;. He&#039;s not a big fan of John Aravosis. Last time I checked Rod 2.0 was pretty decent, but I honestly haven&#039;t been to his site in a while. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This boycott is a joke. This is after the health care bill in Congress that was passed has an amendment to allow gay couples health benefits. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Such morons1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some decent gay activists out there. There&#39;s <a href="http://Lawdork.net" rel="nofollow">Lawdork.net</a>. He&#39;s not a big fan of John Aravosis. Last time I checked Rod 2.0 was pretty decent, but I honestly haven&#39;t been to his site in a while. </p>
<p>This boycott is a joke. This is after the health care bill in Congress that was passed has an amendment to allow gay couples health benefits. </p>
<p>Such morons1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/#comment-9250</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeseeyou.com/?p=3530#comment-9250</guid>
		<description>Why are these pundits acting like not covering an elective abortion is the same as not covering a pap smear? Why are they acting like having an abortion is the same as having a mammogram? WTF is wrong with these folks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are these pundits acting like not covering an elective abortion is the same as not covering a pap smear? Why are they acting like having an abortion is the same as having a mammogram? WTF is wrong with these folks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laRapierWit</title>
		<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/#comment-9249</link>
		<dc:creator>laRapierWit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeseeyou.com/?p=3530#comment-9249</guid>
		<description>I do not have a good feeling about this escalation of troops. Particularly, when we are now learning the CIA is paying Ahmed Karzai, the President of Afghan&#039;s brother....and that the President is protecting his brother from investigation...as he charges high fees to drug trafficers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is very ugly, very dirty and it is about to get REAL nasty.  It is shaping up to be a big lose for the USA.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;----&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot; allegations against Ahmed Wali Karzai, set out yesterday in The New York Times and attributed to current and former US officials, paint a picture of a shadowy potentate and powerbroker with a finger in every pie, whose fief is the south of the country, heartland of the Taliban insurgency.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They could not have emerged at a more awkward time for the Obama administration, as it approaches a critical decision on American troop strength in the country. That decision in turn will be heavily influenced by the outcome of the run-off between Hamid Karzai and Abdullah Abdullah, the former foreign minister, scheduled for 7 November.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After the uproar over the fraud-ridden original election that purported to return Hamid Karzai with an absolute majority of the vote, Washington is counting on the run-off to produce a government that commands trust across the country. That, many policymakers here argue, is an essential precondition if Barack Obama is to authorise the major troop increase sought by General Stanley McChrystal, the US commander in Afghanistan. The signs are that Mr Obama is leaning towards a strategy that would focus on protecting major population centres. This would require more troops than the 68,000 currently in Afghanistan, but not as many as the 40,000 extra or more requested by General McChrystal. But the calculations will inevitably now be even more delicate, amid the controversy over Ahmed Wali Karzai.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/karzais-brother-on-cia-payroll-1811154.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/america...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not have a good feeling about this escalation of troops. Particularly, when we are now learning the CIA is paying Ahmed Karzai, the President of Afghan&#39;s brother&#8230;.and that the President is protecting his brother from investigation&#8230;as he charges high fees to drug trafficers.</p>
<p>This is very ugly, very dirty and it is about to get REAL nasty.  It is shaping up to be a big lose for the USA.</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<p>&#8221; allegations against Ahmed Wali Karzai, set out yesterday in The New York Times and attributed to current and former US officials, paint a picture of a shadowy potentate and powerbroker with a finger in every pie, whose fief is the south of the country, heartland of the Taliban insurgency.</p>
<p>They could not have emerged at a more awkward time for the Obama administration, as it approaches a critical decision on American troop strength in the country. That decision in turn will be heavily influenced by the outcome of the run-off between Hamid Karzai and Abdullah Abdullah, the former foreign minister, scheduled for 7 November.</p>
<p>After the uproar over the fraud-ridden original election that purported to return Hamid Karzai with an absolute majority of the vote, Washington is counting on the run-off to produce a government that commands trust across the country. That, many policymakers here argue, is an essential precondition if Barack Obama is to authorise the major troop increase sought by General Stanley McChrystal, the US commander in Afghanistan. The signs are that Mr Obama is leaning towards a strategy that would focus on protecting major population centres. This would require more troops than the 68,000 currently in Afghanistan, but not as many as the 40,000 extra or more requested by General McChrystal. But the calculations will inevitably now be even more delicate, amid the controversy over Ahmed Wali Karzai.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/karzais-brother-on-cia-payroll-1811154.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/america.." rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/america..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/#comment-9246</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeseeyou.com/?p=3530#comment-9246</guid>
		<description>(whispers &quot;Katt Williams on that stuff&quot;.....)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;well, actually the news here is saying its not how it seems, so we shall see!&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freep.com/article/20091109/ENT07/91109061/-1/LIFESTYLE/Katt-Williams-jailed-over-burglary&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.freep.com/article/20091109/ENT07/911...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(whispers &#8220;Katt Williams on that stuff&#8221;&#8230;..)</p>
<p>well, actually the news here is saying its not how it seems, so we shall see!<br /><a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20091109/ENT07/91109061/-1/LIFESTYLE/Katt-Williams-jailed-over-burglary" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20091109/ENT07/911.." rel="nofollow">http://www.freep.com/article/20091109/ENT07/911..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laRapierWit</title>
		<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/#comment-9243</link>
		<dc:creator>laRapierWit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeseeyou.com/?p=3530#comment-9243</guid>
		<description>The same thing happened to me at Taylor Marsh...she would ban me..because during the primaries I would smack down everything they had to say in support of HCR.  I ripped her apart, and they had no comebacks...so I was banned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I refuse to even lurk. I kept posting at TPM and HuffPo..then finally one day found JJP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I linked to the site, when Baratunde wrote that scathing write up on why he did not support BillandHill and all the things they had done in terms of Bill not backing the judiciary when they wanted to repeal the draconian drug laws, and Hillary jettisoning Edelman and Bill jettisoning LaniGuanier...all those details along with my biggest ax to grind with HCR was her authorization to use military force.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;TaylorMarsh though never accept diverse views, you were either on the Hill band wagon or out of there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same thing happened to me at Taylor Marsh&#8230;she would ban me..because during the primaries I would smack down everything they had to say in support of HCR.  I ripped her apart, and they had no comebacks&#8230;so I was banned.</p>
<p>I refuse to even lurk. I kept posting at TPM and HuffPo..then finally one day found JJP.</p>
<p>I linked to the site, when Baratunde wrote that scathing write up on why he did not support BillandHill and all the things they had done in terms of Bill not backing the judiciary when they wanted to repeal the draconian drug laws, and Hillary jettisoning Edelman and Bill jettisoning LaniGuanier&#8230;all those details along with my biggest ax to grind with HCR was her authorization to use military force.</p>
<p>TaylorMarsh though never accept diverse views, you were either on the Hill band wagon or out of there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/#comment-9242</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeseeyou.com/?p=3530#comment-9242</guid>
		<description>That. Will. Never. Get. Old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That. Will. Never. Get. Old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/09/monday-open-thread-7/#comment-9241</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeseeyou.com/?p=3530#comment-9241</guid>
		<description>CraigHickman is the only one I&#039;ve come across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CraigHickman is the only one I&#39;ve come across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
